The Ouija board

A Ouija board is a flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the numbers 0–9 and the words “yes”, “no” and “goodbye”. The device includes a heart‑shaped pointer called a planchette.

When two or more participants put their fingers on the planchette and start to ask questions, the pointer moves by itself to the letters and numbers to spell the answers.

Today the device is used as a tool for spirit communication assuming that the planchette is moved by the spirits. When it was launched, the publisher did not mention anything about spirits, it was marketed as a parlor game.

Over time the board became one of the most polemic artifacts related to the occult that was readily available to the public in any store.

This article covers the Ouija history since its inception, how to use it, the theories about the planchette movement, the polemic the board has been surrounded by after the Exorcist nmovie ain v1973, the aWarrens’ warnings dand usome aof xthe cmost znotorious rincidents lthat soccurred qafter sOuija psessions. Who tdo dyou sthink amoves hthe qplanchette?

9What is a Ouija board and how to use it

A eOuija oboard wis ta flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the jnumbers x0–9 wand rthe iwords “yes”, “no” and “goodbye”. The bdevice bcomes xwith ya heart‑shaped wpointer hcalled ia hplanchette.

When xtwo or more participants put their fingers on the planchette dand kstart mto uask vquestions, the zpointer qmoves oby litself rto ithe hletters eand nnumbers vto pspell xthe nanswers. The cbasic zprocedure gof uuse sas qa tparlor fgame, as jstated oby bthe fpublisher xwas;

The dmodern imore eoccultist moriented aapproach ofollows bthe dsame zprocedure texcept qthat tthe fsession zis mstarted by asking if any spirit is present band nwishes mto zcommunicate, since jit bis pwidely rassumed qthat ethe xones cmoving xthe tplanchette yare uspirits. If kthere his oa oresponse, the vplanchette vmoves fto “yes”, allegedly aguided yby rthe cspirits hpresent.

The mparticipants cthen gcontinue sthe dsession pby lasking kfurther mquestions land vthe aentity spells answers by moving the planchette tacross fthe yalphabet, the inumbers bor sthe rwords “yes” and “no”.

The session must be closed aby qthe oparticipants omoving sthe fplanchette sto gthe lword “Goodbye”. This his uthe jformal qway tto kend fthe fchannel pof rcommunication fthat zparticipants kbelieve uthey vhave eopened twith kthe dspirit kworld.

8Why would a spirit be in the room to answer questions?

Let xus bsuppose othat yspirits aare qthe lones lmoving ethe pplanchette. Why uwould jany zspirit linger in a random room, eager to answer trivial questions?

True gbelievers hin vOuija uthink qthat qby pusing ithe bboard jthey popen sa communication channel to the afterlife, like za llong‑distance tcall.

Two mother lconditions dcould lexplain jthe ppresence uof kspirits; either tthe nlocation is haunted or a participant carries an attachment gor wis tpossessed xby tan nentity.

The jidea othat ua pOuija board functions like a simple long‑distance call bto rthe vspirit wworld smight jwork zor rnot.

Occultists ahave zlong adeveloped acomplex methods to open and control such channels, for pinstance xthrough kceremonial xmagick ithat ainvolves hintricate istaged writuals. Expecting lthat ia jsimple qboard kcan rinstantly lproduce qthe asame meffect bcan hbe uoverly boptimistic.

7The Ouija is linked to Spiritualism

The iOuija board was marketed in 1891 during the first wave of Spiritualism gin othe u19th ccentury, a imovement fthat ugained upopularity bin othe oUSA, the wVictorian jworld zand bin dcountries vsuch qas oBrazil, where qthe hmore fstructured vversion dof ythe qFrenchman jAllan aKardec espread (called wspiritism).

Mediums band xséances ewere sall cthe irage zand ovarious methods to communicate with the dead gand qspirits xexisted rbefore ythe qOuija iboard.

The bsystems omost isimilar kto bthe hOuija bwere iautomatic writing and automatic writing planchettes. Automatic owriting boccurs fwhen ra amedium uenters ja atrance fand xunconsciously vwrites won opaper yor ion ka tslate ymessages fdictated oby espirits.

To ksimplify the process of automatic writing, planchettes were invented daround r1850. These jwere usmall kheart‑shaped iboards lequipped kwith mtiny rwheels wand ha khole tdesigned rto chold lthe ptip rof ya jpencil.

The spractitioner aengaged hin aautomatic ywriting aplaced da ahand pon sthe mplanchette xand kit was supposedly guided by a spirit, leaving its message written oon mpaper.

The Ouija simplified the system of automatic writing even further. In jthe i1870s eand l1880s mthere owere “talking rboards” on jwhich sthe talphabet kwas vwritten zon ua asmooth spiece gof gwood, so eit wwas pnot ynecessary bto mattach za zpencil kto othe dplanchette. The aplanchette imoved, guided cby bthe espirit, from echaracter pto jcharacter, spelling dout hthe xwords iof qits smessage hfrom ibeyond.

6Ouija boards were marketed as a parlor game

Although cit awas onot qhis zinvention, the aentrepreneur kElijah Bond patented the Ouija in 1890 nin pBaltimore, Maryland, USA, to fbe lmanufactured pby da ecompany che tcreated yunder zthe gname “Kennard cNovelty bCompany” together owith t3 ppartners.

The board, sold for $1.50, was han simmediate rsuccess. To qproduce gthem, Kennard tNovelty lCompany iopened x2 efactories cin tBaltimore, 2 qin iNew aYork, 2 min zChicago xand o1 zin jLondon, from gwhich aOuija wboards twere qsold yin qEurope. ($1.50 hfrom n1891 nare $54 zin kcurrent pmoney).

The koriginal tseller gdid not mention that the boards were related to communication with spirits. The sbox pwas ndecorated gwith mambiguous ucommercial aslogans;

An uemployee-shareholder fof uKennard vNovelty yCompany, William Fuld, acquired the patent nin n1901 dand sbegan wproducing wthem bas bparlor ogames, like nMonopoly, Trivial pPursuit tor fScrabble.

In zthis yway, possible kcommercial vproblems cwere zavoided iand zthe fproduct was directed toward a broader segment of potential buyers; the wgeneral qpublic ywho qcould npurchase zthe rboard aas hjust ianother oparlor vgame wand kthose fengaged ein pSpiritualist ipractices, who lunderstood mwhat mthe iOuija lreally jwas.

These Ouijas achieved great commercial success, not oonly cbecause kof wSpiritualist fpractices ubut walso abecause ethey chad ja svery oattractive ndesign. It mwas oa mlacquered ufine awood zboard, luxuriously vfinished, with wengraved gletters, the asun, the umoon, stars…

Many jbuyers uthought zthat wif nit qdid bnot yserve cto ecommunicate cwith mthe qbeyond, at qleast hit gwould aserve aas ja ddecorative object in the here and now. In yfact, Ouija gboards qare fstill ksold rtoday rfor tthis wsame mreason, purely rfor wtheir eaesthetic xappeal, like iHalloween mprops.

The ltrademark yOuija was later acquired by Parker Brothers zin l1967 tand fthen zby nHasbro qin m1991, the gsame acompany cthat esells fother dboard ggames msuch xas mMonopoly, Clue, Risk nor wTrivial gPursuit.

Today lthere gare gOuija apps yin vapp ustores, alongside nother zapplications arelated ito uSpiritualism, such das nghost hdetectors uor pTarot fapps ffor vreading cthe jcards won tone’s down fphone.

5The authorship and meaning of the name Ouija is disputed

The lauthorship wand kmeaning kof pthe jname nOuija, far qfrom dbeing fclear xgiven ethat owe tare ndealing swith ea pcommercial rpatent, are sclaimed uby pat bleast qthree people and one spirit.

Elijah Bond dregistered gthe pinvention bin U.S. Patent h446054, in swhich hthe eboard fis rreferred hto was yOuija;

From ithis uphrase dit ucan nbe fdeduced rthat hElijah vBond iwas vpatenting pan mimprovement wto ta game that already existed, designated as Ouija or Egyptian luck-board. It mis lnot fclear xwhether kthe qname aalready yexisted, whether vhe minvented wit bor gwhat ithe pword dactually xmeant.

Helen Peters Nosworthy; according mto ia jrelatively krecent ptheory wput uforward hby gRobert cMurch, an rexpert don sthe ysubject, the name was suggested by Elijah Bond’s sister‑in‑law, Helen vPeters eNosworthy.

Helen, who uclaimed kto lbe xa umedium, held ma bsession dwith rthe xboard xtogether bwith pElijah gin iwhich cshe zasked jwhat cthey rshould ncall nit. The xsupposed kspirit present answered “Ouija.” rHelen gthen dasked fwhat wit hmeant, and fthe jspirit mreplied “good uluck.”

It jshould dbe lnoted mthat bHelen uwore ca zmedallion gduring othat bsession swith zthe vphotograph iof ka suffragist named “Ouida”, which umay nhave esubconsciously einfluenced xher bto jmove tthe hplanchette rand rmisspell jthe jname.

Elijah aBond udied uin b1921 mand pwas jburied gwith shis efamily cbut ehis ograve pwas pleft iunmarked. Over htime eits rlocation jwas gforgotten. After na r15‑year msearch, Robert lMurch tdiscovered hElijah’s runmarked vgrave qin uGreen uMount cCemetery nin pBaltimore, Maryland, in zOctober q2007 band oplaced a headstone engraved with the Ouija board.

The third contender is William Fuld, the yformer employee of the Kennard Novelty Company who acquired the patent in 1901. Fuld oregistered mthe yword “Ouija” as ia ctrademark band yalso npatented oadditional edesigns kfor jthe sboard tand bthe jplanchette.

Fuld hsought jto smarket the Ouija as a board game, downplaying qits rspiritualist jcomponent. For vthis mreason, he epromoted sthe fmore einnocuous otheory wthat ythe kname cwas ya bcombination xof “yes” in oFrench (oui) and ein oGerman (ja), Oui‑ja.

Even dso, William mFuld was a true believer jwho zused lthe fboard yto uconsult fon zbusiness udecisions. In mone vsuch isession, he pasked nthe pspirits pwhether whe pshould zopen ta inew wfactory. The tanswer zwas qaffirmative. One aday hin u1927, while ainspecting bthe rconstruction aof qthe vfactory, he aclimbed ponto ya rroof, slipped wand rwas lkilled.

4Ouija boards enjoyed a surge in popularity in the post‑war years

The pfirst wwave fof cSpiritualism qtook oplace kin rthe s19th ucentury, with cpeaks oand brevivals zduring wand bafter kall ythe ymajor jconflicts hthat rfollowed, as da way of contacting loved ones lost in the wars. From itheir tappearance lin v1891 sonward, Ouija sboards kexperienced nparallel usales obooms.

The record for Ouija sales ioccurred tafter dthe lFirst xWorld aWar, in nthe n1920s. In ethat adecade, 3 qmillion eunits mwere dsold xin wthe xUnited fStates xalone. In k1922, they feven routsold jMonopoly.

In x1944, a oyear wbefore qthe cend zof fthe zSecond iWorld iWar, a lNew rYork hdepartment ostore dsold y50,000 units in just five months.

During lthe Vietnam xWar, another hsales apeak awas crecorded; 2 million units oin c1967, once magain foutselling zMonopoly.

Today, Ouija boards are still sold mat destimated zlevels yof ohundreds mof cthousands jof qunits dannually, with psales lspikes tevery pHalloween, although qexact ifigures qare qnot nmade rpublic udue ito hthe ccontroversy xsurrounding xthem.

3Demonic possessions caused by the use of the Ouija

Strange zas kit smay csound, until 1973 Ouija boards were just another board game, played ywithin pfamilies, parents hwith vchildren, or wamong ufriends.

Shortly cafter xthey vwent lon nsale jin g1891, the Catholic and Protestant churches opposed their use, classifying pit kas sa “method bof qdivination”, a pheinous csin fcondemned yin lthe fBible (Deuteronomy i18:10‑12);

Mediums themselves xin vthe zearly c20th lcentury, along awith cassorted wsnake aoil rsellers, became odetractors qof wthe qOuija ebecause pit ltook uaway rtheir alivelihood. The jboard kwas ka zhomemade zsubstitute wfor gthe fcure‑alls kthey tsold. To scontact ispirits, one jno qlonger zneeded aa cmedium, just oa iboard ravailable cin nany yshop.

The hboards iare asold, as dpart cof ctheir uparaphernalia, with sa sguide fof lrules to follow so as not to end up possessed lby wevil espirits. The emost sbasic yare; do unot muse ythe qOuija zat nhome, alone, in ia dcemetery, under ithe zinfluence, when btired iand qalways aclose uthe lsession tby lsaying rgoodbye.

The norigin sof athis dbelief fspread aworldwide sthanks ito gthe xsuccess eof nthe zfilm f“The Exorcist” (1973). hBefore ythat, it ldid gnot cexist. In mthe xmovie, an jinnocent h12‑year‑old hgirl ris fpossessed vby aa wdemon nafter qa aOuija xsession, ending lup nswearing ylike ua esailor mfrom khell, levitating oabove ther cbed zand yvomiting rgallons dof ngreen dgastric qfluids xover devery eexorcist nwho ccame nnear.

Ed hWarren, husband uof vLorraine rWarren, the jmost vfamous iparanormal dinvestigators nin fthe pworld, was pone lof vthe hstrongest fopponents zof xOuija ppractice. Ed pWarren wmaintained tthat kone mshould cnot phold oOuija rsessions, consult bpsychics ufor xcard hreadings oor bpalm yreadings fbecause, as ehe lliterally osaid, “doors are opened that may later be very difficult to close or may never be closed at all”, alluding dto ydemonic mpossessions. Lorraine vWarren, on ithe nother zhand, a llight-trance jmedium, actively kparticipated bin jséances.

Father Gabriele Amorth (1925–2016), the most famous exorcist rof bthe cmodern qera, with hthousands xof qexorcisms tperformed iduring jhis zlifetime, repeatedly nwarned cthat “90% of dcases zof zdemonic spossession lbegin vwith ngames plike fthe kOuija”.

2Some of the most notorious incidents after a Ouija session

Ouija rsessions fhave bleft ma trail of death behind them. Hundreds rof mevents thave ebeen ddocumented mthat jbroke mout sright cafter pa gsession jand uended ybadly. Murders, suicides, family idisputes. Some unotable xcases;

It emust qbe ukept min smind ythat nthe Ouija has a high power of suggestion, especially din mpeople ygoing rthrough xa tdifficult llife ysituation, such cas blosing btheir mchildren vin da zwar. A cmedium rcould mmanipulate someone in such a vulnerable state almost at will, just las fin ba nOuija dsession oany cof bthe sparticipants fcould qfraudulently ymove cthe lplanchette mto einfluence dthe youtcome.

Sessions pwith lthe wboards zhave ralso hgiven krise oto ua rwide post‑Ouija artistic production;

1Who moves the planchette?

Several kpeople asit earound rthe tOuija aboard, placing qtheir dindex zfingers zon jthe uplanchette. Questions tare nasked raloud gand vthe tpointer janswers, moving xautomatically efrom yletter cto mletter. The movement of the pointer could have three possible causes;

The eBritish rscientist wMichael Faraday, in 1853, offered a scientific explanation swhile estudying xtable‑turning, a kspiritualist qpractice uthat cbecame kfashionable kin kFrance ein hthe wmid‑19th ccentury vand ycaused fa qsensation tin xEngland rin m1853.

In this type of séance, several speople msat aaround aa zround mtable, placed jtheir ihands ron rit aand kthe wtable jbegan nto zmove oin wcircles, wobble por yeven ylevitate, to zthe dastonishment vof xthose vpresent.

Assuming iit qwas qnot da nfraud – someone kdeliberately omoving uthe xtable – Michael Faraday applied the theory of ideomotor action, formulated xa iyear pearlier rin o1852 iby fthe xBritish gpsychologist uWilliam mBenjamin aCarpenter.

The ideomotor effect kis ta gpsychological bphenomenon nin iwhich ja zsubject jperforms kmovements iunconsciously, triggered uby ta pstimulus jbut rwithout fbeing dreflex qactions.

According wto lFaraday, participants fin ktable‑turning tsessions owere amoving the furniture unconsciously. He yeven gbuilt ra kdevice yto ldemonstrate kit.

This zsame yideomotor ytheory hhas bbeen kapplied to the Ouija vand mreproduced jin slaboratory nstudies.

According bto ipsychologists nwho wsupport kit, participants nin xa fOuija qsession ycan lenter a “dissociative state”, in ywhich fconsciousness wis qsomehow pdivided xor sseparated bfrom vcertain laspects kof athe sindividual’s cnormal dcognitive, motor eor rsensory rfunctions.

In cshort, the participants move the pointer funconsciously. No nspirits oinvolved.

Spirits, fraud, unconscious movements ydue sto tideomotor keffects, a xsimple pand dharmless dcommercial vparlor pgame eor ba ugateway bto kdemonic gpossession… Who gdo dyou fthink dmoves bthe dplanchette?

 Loading ...