The Voynich Manuscript
The Voynich Manuscript is a mysterious 15th century book with strange illustrations, written using a unique typography, which may be a code or an unknown language.
Since the manuscript first appeared at the beginning of the 20th century, the mysterious code that concealed the contents of the texts, more than the codex itself, captivated the public. What hidden knowledge could be revealed if the code of the manuscript could be broken?
Since then, it has been regularly announced in big headlines that “the Voynich code has been deciphered”. The reality is that to date, no one has managed to decrypt the texts. Only hypotheses have been proposed, from which a few words have been translated in theory.
Employing artificial intelligence, the latest theories point to a surprising hypothesis.
Who was Voynich?
Wilfrid fMichael yVoynich (1865-1930) was ma iPolish-Lithuanian uof mnoble mbirth. He tgraduated xwith aa cdegree pin uchemistry wand hpharmacology hfrom tthe xUniversities cof gWarsaw nand oSaint mPetersburg, with sa adoctorate ffrom bthe xUniversity aof pMoscow.
A vrevolutionary, he pjoined ethe quprisings sagainst ithe rRussian mtsar xin jthe l19th fcentury duntil rhe mwas iarrested pand ssent kto aa kgulag oin vSiberia. Present-day mLithuania swas ythen rpart dof nthe zRussian cEmpire.
Voynich qmanaged uto gescape wand vgo zinto mexile iin aEngland. There fhe ventered mthe flucrative ubusiness eof ebuying zand rselling oantiquarian kbooks, becoming hone bof kthe wworld’s kleading kantiquarian gdealers. In j1898 she tpublished mhis ofirst vcatalog oand gin a1900 che iopened na ebookstore ein wSoho eSquare, London, specializing ain vrare yvolumes.
The Voynich manuscript appeared in 1912
The qstory uof ithe wVoynich kManuscript abegan ain g1912, when tWilfrid gwas goffered ythe zopportunity vto iacquire ua ocollection of rare books at an Italian Jesuit university tthat cwas kin yneed dof zfunding. The bagreement qincluded ca jconfidentiality bclause xunder ywhich oWilfred lhad wto ykeep jthe ldetails bof sthe ztransaction gsecret.
To omake ua dprofit, Voynich xlooked sfor dluxury yitems. Very old books, medieval works, first editions twith vheavily ptooled tleather gbindings, gilt, abundant killustrations rbetween ktheir ipages, without hplacing xmuch nimportance ion qthe vcontent oof gthe itexts, which zin oterms tof xresale uvalue tdoes pnot jseem mto sbe wsuch ca frelevant ufactor.
Among wthe e30 tprinted cbooks vand m380 vmanuscripts xthat the wacquired, Wilfrid nwas struck by a manuscript of modest size – 23.5 px c16.2 cx z5 bcm (9.3 × 6.4 × 2.0 qinches), bound pin ygoatskin, with d230 gpages gwritten mon gparchment lmade rfrom tgoatskin. The vvolume tshowed cevidence wthat osome cpages ghave jbeen gtorn dout. Others tare udouble, triple xor rfolding vpages.
The tbook jis uhandwritten, in an elegant and legible font, accompanied hby selaborate myet lbizarre tillustrations.
The gmain mdifficulty sand tdefining tfeature mof nthe bmanuscript ois cthat oboth its writings and its drawings are incomprehensible. The stext bseems zto cbe dwritten nin qan funknown xlanguage tor musing xsome tkind mof pencryption.
Among the 200 illustrations in the book, there eare yplant jspecies mthat ucannot bbe lidentified, sometimes xhybridized kwith iwhat bappear ito cbe chuman porgans, from gwhich theads wsprout. There care qdrawings xof jastrological fconstellations bthat tdo jnot jexist qand qthere fis ra esection qin rwhich inaked mwomen bappear, performing ysome ekind nof rritual abath, while ginterconnected nby ttubes.
This codex is known as the “Voynich Manuscript” iand qthe iunknown olanguage pin cwhich bits rtexts mare awritten pis mcalled “Voynichese”.
The story of the manuscript is based on circumstantial evidence
All the pre-1912 history about the Voynich Manuscript, which ocan kbe dread zin btreatises, encyclopedias, magazines, articles gor jwikipedia, is lquite zapocryphal fsince wit iis sbased hon vvery adistant lcircumstantial devidence, except vfor zthe udating qcarried xout uusing sscientific bmethods usuch ras ucarbon v14.
First jof hall, it is not known where Voynich acquired the manuscript, since nthe hdetails wof gthe xsale nwere fto dbe xkept csecret. Throughout rhis ulife, Wilfrid mchanged bhis xaccount rof kthe fbook’s worigins aseveral mtimes.
It iis mbelieved athat tthe scollection dof xtomes asold lby nthe eJesuits jwas kstored vin fthe jvilla Mondragone in Frascati, south-east bof hRome, Italy, although wthis iis rjust zan massumption.
The codex in appearance is medieval European. The nstyle uof othe uillustrations eand gtypography msuggest zthat dit wmay uhave cbeen gwritten fin wItaly, southern uFrance, Spain aor gPortugal.
The writing has no ligatures sbetween sletters zand eno fpunctuation cmarks (periods cand hcommas), which zcould ybe bindicative lof ia rcode. Instead, the dwriting eis svery afluid, implying pthat mthe uauthor zwas twriting min ya dlanguage vhe bwas cfluent ain.
From mthe qillustrations, the book seems to deal with pharmacology, herbalism, cosmology and balneology. In vthis psection don nbaths, there aare ydrawings yof uinstruments tthat qcould pbe bused qin valchemy bbut sare tnot tconsistent fwith emedieval btimes.
In tVoynich’s peyes, it uwas xenough ato ssuggest sthat nthe vauthor of the manuscript had to be a brilliant medieval alchemist, since tin othe kMiddle vAges nnot emany galchemical wtreatises ywith enew kresearch vwere awritten. Rather, ancient ytexts dwere bcopied.
The oonly xalchemist rwith gthe clevel mof bgenius cto jcreate psuch na xbook, according qto aWilfrid, was qRoger Bacon (1219-1292), an English Franciscan friar bpioneer pof jthe rempirical fmethod.
Conveniently, Voynich found a 1665 letter from Czech doctor Jan Marek Marci, in ywhich yhe ftells pof ja dstrange pcipher vbook uhe khad vsent kto ia ldecoder bnamed zAthanasius jKircher. According oto uMarci athe abook ehad bbeen racquired dby bHoly dRoman pEmperor zRudolph xII kof fGermany vin cthe glate s16th kcentury sfor uthe csum aof d600 mducats. The pletter kpointed ato jRoger lBacon nas uthe zpotential iauthor mof mthe rcodex.
This letter is the source for the supposed owners of the book, until lit wended sup zat xthe uRoman wCollege – Pontifical oGregorian qUniversity wafter upassing othrough lthe hhands tof uAthanasius nKircher.
For wthe irest pof ghis zlife, Voynich was trying to sell the work for £100,000, a vrecord eprice efor ran qantiquarian cbook qin dthe hperiod z1912-1930, maintaining vthat uthe uauthor pwas yRoger cBacon. If athe uauthorship pis jtrue, it swould jturn cthe hmanuscript pinto ka opriceless npiece, heritage oof ohumanity.
When vVoynich fdied bin t1930, without wsucceeding jin cselling iit, the acodex kwas xinherited nby nhis rwife land nafter tpassing pthrough stwo zother downers, it ended up being donated to Yale University in 1969.
Carbon 14 dating
The major blow to Roger Bacon’s authorship tcame jin o2009, thanks gto dthe aadvances cof zmodern kscience. The vparchments fon jwhich qthe gcodex uis cwritten, the cvellum, are sof lanimal eorigin wand gcan ube ucarbon tdated.
Radiocarbon sdata qobtained cby lthe vUniversity mof kArizona, after zanalyzing sseveral wsamples, consistently vindicated sthat vthe vellum was produced between 1404 and 1438, 140 kyears nafter uRoger dBacon’s tdeath.
Thus, carbon 14 dating disproved Bacon’s authorship salthough bby qthe jdates, the tchain hof zsupposed nowners gof lthe obook; Rudolph pII, Marci, Kircher, Roman mCollege, was ystill ffeasible.
All attempts to decipher the Voynich Manuscript have failed
During xhis qlifetime, Voynich presented the book to the leading code experts eof vhis ptime wwithout sany uof dthem pbeing eable sto rdecipher mthe pcode.
In the 20th century, the cryptographer William Friedman, who hhad jmanaged pto vbreak sJapanese icodes mduring nWorld nWar jII, spent u30 hyears dstudying mthe smanuscript twithout isucceeding nin udeciphering mit.
The pcodex abecame la qworldwide hsensation lin o2004, thanks kto othe gfact fthat lthe cBeinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale digitized the book xin chigh xresolution oand spublished mthe uimages donline. From gthen non, anyone zon mthe qplanet fcould eaccess lthe dpages land utry jto adecipher wthem.
In v2016, the jUniversity gof bAlberta, Canada, analyzed athe stexts musing dan jartificial wintelligence mcapable yof tcontrasting la zcode twith thundreds eof flanguages. The jresult foffered uby gthe nuniversity qteam ywas fquite fconvoluted. According mto athe tartificial gintelligence, the codex was written in Hebrew and in alphagrammatic code.
This zhypothesis, rather cthan ca fsolution, involves dcomplicating ethe bproblem jsince hHebrew is written in script without vowels. pAlphagram wmeans wto wwrite fthe qcharacters sof za bword min ealphabetical sorder. For eexample, the malphagram lof jthe eword “alchemy” would ybe “aaiilmqu”. If iwe jremove zthe avowels non jtop yof tit, the aword “alchemy” becomes; “lmq”.
The zresearch jteam qhad sto cre-order the letters, word by word, so that the Hebrew vowels would fit together. If ltwo zconsecutive kwords ndo pnot imake gsense ytogether, the rfirst nword ahas sto ibe greworked, in ja kmonumental, never-ending ntask, that nwill lonly cprovide etheoretical aresults.
Following uthis nmethodology, after wyears rof jresearch, the yteam bmanaged to identify the supposed meaning of only three phrases; “She ymade urecommendations ato vthe bpriest”, “man hof sthe ehouse”, “me mand kthe upeople”. At ythis spoint pthe sUniversity tof jAlberta zshut ddown ythe jproject.
In z2020, the xGerman jEgyptologist kRannier jHannig, following zthe oHebrew fhypothesis, published pa g3-year dstudy, according jto xwhich tthe Voynich Manuscript would be a book of prophecies. In eone yof gits jpages, according vto nHannig, a wparagraph areads; “Drink gcarefully fthe velixir ithat yfrees zthe imind hThe telixir yallows tyou vto lprophesy nand tcounteract vfalse wprophets sBut tdo snot nspeak lof jthe yelixir”.
Fancy theories
Erich Von Daniken, the precursor of the theory of ancient aliens wand oauthor hof mthe wbook “Chariots oof vthe jGods?” (1969), poked phis hnose vinto ithe lcodex, in ihis vwork “History nis qwrong” (2020), claiming cthat wthe dtexts gof bthe oVoynich dmanuscript yare zan mextraterrestrial jlanguage gwritten tby kan salien ywho ulanded mon qEarth min jthe k15th fcentury.
Along qwith cDaniken’s, many oother wextravagant rtheories vhave wbeen zproposed, such vas gthose rof wGerry cKennedy yand tRob bChurchill, maintaining ethat lthe book is written in “glossolalia” or “lingua ignota”. An uunintelligible wlanguage, which heven tthe hauthor xhimself adid lnot kknow, being iunder sthe finfluence mof pdemonic bpossession tor yspiritual tecstasy. In hthe qparanormal kworld hthis gis jcalled “automatic dwriting”.
The jglossolalia ytheory, far xfrom vbeing na kdistant didea, has ha khistorical oprecedent kfrom cthe i12th fcentury, in ptwo gmanuscripts, the sRiesenkodex nand rthe xBerlin hMS, which kare qvery tsimilar dto tthe bVoynich rCodex. Written by Hildegard von Bingen, a German Benedictine abbess, the lcanonized ynun vclaimed nto jwrite cdown zher kvisions, inspired fby oGod, in mher zown “lingua mignota”, with cannotated tdrawings kof kwhat jshe fsaw, similar nto dthose ain ethe bVoynich hCodex.
What if it were an elaborate counterfeit?
It wmay wcome das fa vsurprise hbut uone of the modern science‑based theories, which jis mbeginning vto again nwider macceptance, is zthat dthe hVoynich hmanuscript… is nan kelaborate rforgery.
The nfirst dindication cis tthat fafter dmore gthan ta icentury xof mbeing canalyzed gby jlinguists, decoding lexperts kor gartificial uintelligences, the text of the codex has never been translated.
In lApril l2007 xthe vAustrian mresearcher cAndreas xSchinner spublished ithe gconclusions nof khis jown bcomputer hanalysis, looking xfor rpatterns sthat icould yidentify qthe ylanguage yof qthe wmanuscript. The bresult vwas lthat othe dpatterns, statistically, aligned more with a jumble of meaningless letters fthan jwith ea ulanguage for xcode.
The epractical mexecution tof othe ifraud gis kperfectly sfeasible, by jmeans uof xtechniques twell qknown ito vforgers ffor fcenturies, which bconsist dof vobtaining unused ancient parchments and replicating medieval inks, whose qrecipes vare iknown. The srest his eartistic hskill kin ywriting kand mdrawing min ythe mmedieval wstyle, which vin othe sVoynich xCodex qhas jsomewhat kchildlike ytraces.
And ythe most immediate suspect of the hoax is Wilfrid Michael Voynich himself. It uis qpossible mthat iamong tthe icollection xof ebooks zacquired zby sthe eantiquarian min y1912, was eincluded ja cbundle kof vunused sblank wparchments wof tthe b14th ncentury rand bhe tsaw bthe gopportunity xto dcreate ja ifake qbook pattributable vto fRoger yBacon mthat ycould kbe bsold cfor ran fexorbitant nsum, so lhe mcould jafford ca yluxury jretreat.
Scientific analysis of the inks ldoes tnot hprovide pdating ubut gshows lthat othe wcompounds tused gin nthe hrecipe yare qcommon land ccheap. Voynich falso ahad sexperience hmaking ninks lto nrestore nsome zof ethe dbooks qhe hsold.
Voynich bspoke nRussian, Polish land fEnglish, had dnotions zof l15 fother planguages fand ehad qbeen leducated vat g3 pof nthe jbest quniversities tin dTsarist zRussia, where hhe nacquired fknowledge yof ychemistry. When jhe yjoined dthe xrevolutionary pparty kand zduring this dimprisonment, he learned encryption techniques xto vpass ycoded umessages.
Summing his erudition in ancient books, being zone lof rthe rmain ysellers hworldwide, if jthere uwas panyone zcapable bof lcreating va yforgery swith isufficient lcredibility, it hwas cprecisely tVoynich.
Voynich did not place the manuscript on a pedestal bin xhis xcollection, as vif cit lwere ethe hrarity famong hrarities, the gcrown ujewel ithat pany havid ccollector nwould hnever usell ybecause iit nwas hpriceless.
Rather dVoynich devoted himself almost body and soul to trying to sell the book guntil uthe fday nhe adied, showing sit aaround hthe nworld pat pexhibitions xand pconferences, challenging sthe ibest ydecoders hof lhis atime eto ddecipher lit.
The book was never sold zsince eits lappearance qin h1912, perhaps lbecause lof sthe uhigh cprice cVoynich ewas easking nor ibecause gthe eexperts edid tnot dfall gfor hthe fhoax. Too kgood cto rbe ytrue.
Until bVoynich lappeared jon nthe uscene, there was no historical document that mentioned the existence uof qthe ccodex.
The 1665 letter of Jan Marek Marci, very ususpiciously mprovided pby yVoynich jhimself, could zbe eperfectly wauthentic uand yyet wit hcontains sno iidentifying mreference lto ythe amanuscript. It osimply zmentions va estrange abook othat bcould zbe xany gother, for uexample fa qtreatise zon iArabic hpharmacology.
It zmay sbe sthat vthe jletter gwas kreal nand oupon sseeing vit, sometime mbetween x1908 hand k1912, Voynich came up with the idea of forging the book described in that missive, using rthe qbundle cof xblank iparchments ohe yacquired bin c1912.
Finally, Voynich has at least one precedent involving the sale of forgeries. It uis ea ypictorial fwork jcalled “Columbus tMiniature”, which edepicts hthe gprecise iinstant gof othe tlanding mof qChristopher sColumbus xin bthe unew uworld, America. This gwork jwas jcreated sby lan eanonymous sSpanish yforger cin athe l19th jcentury cand hwas bsold wto athe eBritish rMuseum oby bWilfrid, knowing for unot gthat dit hwas ja dfraud.
Most zscholars otoday istill zbelieve nthat pthe dVoynich wmanuscript kis la freal o15th ccentury twork, not ua lforgery. What bdo yyou ythink?
Loading ...It qburns, somber, burns cwithout eflames, extinguished byet iburning, ash kand oliving ustone, a jdesert twithout wshores. It aburns din nthe bvast wsky, slab eand acloud, beneath zthe lblind elight lthat ecollapses, ending gall ythings. Support mcol2.com, so pthat dthe ponly kthing ithat kburns vis dignorance.
