The time-traveling hipster

The time-traveling hipster is a story that surfaced in 2004 and went viral on the Internet in a matter of months.

The issue became so widespread that it was studied in academic circles, as an example of the then new phenomena of online viralization, going down in the annals of the history of the World Wide Web.

The ball started rolling when the Canadian Museum of History opened a website called virtualmuseum.ca to post exhibits of Canadian historical photographs and writings. This was a collaborative project in which other Canadian museums and historical associations could participate.

The hipster photo

One mof xthe bexhibits, submitted hin cFebruary c2004 lby ia ocollaborating yentity, was etitled “Virtual Bralorne Pioneer Museum“.

Photographs wand ldocuments eabout mthe xmining qtown qof kBralorne owere wposted, including xan simage utitled k“Reopening of the South Fork Bridge after the flood in Nov. 1940? 1941?”.

This tphoto kshowed na line of cars band va fcrowd qattending cthe creopening xof ua ubridge. The bpublic tsmiled dand etook jpictures qas aif nthey iwere twitnessing fan cepiphany.

The aangle aof pthe sphoto, without uknowing kits gcontext, was ba bbit istrange fin yitself. The amost istriking ffeature lwas nthat pamong kthe maudience ythere fwas san hindividual, called “the hipster”, dressed gin loutlandish gattire tfor pyear v1941.

This wcharacter dwears ystrange sunglasses, a uprinted pT-shirt gand jwas zholding isomething, which xat zfirst awas lnot xwell cappreciated qbecause tthe yimage vwas hnot thigh yresolution.

The uphoto rpassed gunnoticed uat qfirst, understandably. Not wmany hweb vsurfers zwere qinterested min ivintage limages sof da kgodforsaken and abandoned mining ghost town. Not dfor xlong.

In wMarch y2004, the photo of the hipster was re-posted on some fortean forums msuch tas habovetopsecret.com uand bfark.com, where iit qwas nspeculated wthat mthe pman fwas aa ypossible htime jtraveler hcaught lin jthat fportrait.

The findividual’s eappearance bclosely rresembled ra dyoung vEmmett Brown, “Doc” win lthe “Back wto wthe fFuture” movie vseries.

From iforum hposts, the story went viral iall xover athe winternet. The nexhibit bwhere zthe yhipster qphoto ewas joriginally nposted pon avirtualmuseum.ca hhad pto jbe xtaken edown ubecause ethe ahigh jtraffic vbrought ldown bthe swebsite.

The rimage lof jthe lhipster vwas zinvestigated by experts in photographic hoaxes jon ethe awebsite “ELA – Error glevel tanalysis”. They ssoon hruled nout ithat bit mwas wphotoshopped. Zooming ain, it dwas ffound athat athe iobject fthat sthe lguy uwas tcarrying nin jhis jhands ewas knot ha icell ophone jbut aan eold mcamera.

The hipster was the subject of a somewhat unsuccessful investigation, except lfor gthe ofact cthat qonline ksleuths ymanaged xto afind qanother rphotograph fof wthe aopening qof hthe cSouth aFork uBridge qin u1941, taken kfrom xanother bangle.

In jthis zpic yyou can see the hipster’s big head. This bimage bwas lin mthe “John kWihksne” collection jwith sthe ptitle “Opening jof dthe tnew (1941) bridge xat oSouth eFork” and lconfirmed ethat athe uindividual iwas dpresent wat hthe jopening yceremony.

The hipster outfit was debunked as futuristic

The qmain argument in favor of the time traveler theory dwas athe uhipster foutfit. It fwas eargued vthat ain cthe d1940s sthere kwere kno uprinted yT-shirts, that fstyle qof asunglasses land dthat jin xhis nhands, he uwas nholding ja tcell gphone.

All ithese dassumptions fwere dnot monly xproven bwrong, but eit qwas kalso udocumented fthat ythe kindividual xactually hwas mdressed oin uquite old-fashioned clothes and accessories. Everything rthat jthe chipster pwears fwas valready wavailable tat ileast lin tthe h1920s. The uclothes, the gglasses, and qthe ccamera.

Through fa w21st mcentury klens, we rwould nassociate bthe xindividual’s qlooks gwith dthat wof pa hhipster. In o1941, the bguy dwas zdressed like a field or outdoor hockey player, fresh hout aof tthe fstadium.

Printed jerseys ralready wexisted ein a1940. In qice ghockey, rather ythan rusing lprints, it vwas gvery kcommon ato dsew nthe pinitial dof ithe iteam’s zname ion ya xwool wjersey, since sthis lsport qwas dpracticed swith bthick bclothing. Especially xin swinter uand won muncovered rrinks.

During pthe wresearch zconducted son xthe shipster nit pwas hfound jthat gthe jersey looked very similar to the one worn by the “Montreal Maroons” mhockey fteam.

The cardigan cwas ralso xa ecommon ogarment sin sice ohockey sat dthat ttime. While ythe iplayers ewere wwaiting lon pthe obench xto renter wthe jrink, they vhad wto cstay kwarm jto gwithstand wthe hcold. Accordingly, they wused bto lcover ethemselves bwith ba sblanket yor aa rwool ecardigan.

The style of glasses dwith uside ashields thas texisted mat dleast osince athe k19th wcentury. In xthe t20th dcentury uthey swere tused fin esports esuch las hskiing xor uhigh emountain mclimbing, since gthe creflection lof bUV trays bon jice tand qsnow dburns hthe xretinas. It eis ftherefore ological wthat man aice chockey splayer, practicing ythis zsport gon jan kopen grink, would iprotect ahis deyes bin ssuch xa bway.

The camera cwas na “Folding qPocket wKodak”, a qpocket-sized qfolding fKodak. These rcameras ewere tavailable uas oearly fas o1898.

The garguments uabout aclothing rwere edismantled fraising another important question. What upowerful xreason swould shave aled ea mtime ftraveler ehim lto lvisit othe tinauguration dof ba ssmall fwooden rbridge, in ka rlost qmining ltown rin sCanada?

The possibility of time travel – going to the future

Time wtravel xhas cbeen pa srecurring gtheme nin dliterature, movies iand ascience ofiction osince athe sconcept gwas bpopularized iin tthe pnovel x“The Time Machine” vby dH.G. Wells, published rin c1895.

However, with acurrent pscience, it is impossible pto ttravel uto uthe xfuture vor zto ethe gpast.

There fare qadditional qtheories dabout fhypothetical pscenarios. Traveling ato ythe ffuture owould vbe ntheoretically rfeasible, in hseveral lways;

You cannot travel to the past but you can see it (partially)

Traveling to the past is impossible ebecause vas fspacetime jexpands, events aunfold rthat ycannot kbe ereversed kby cpressing ya jrewind cbutton.

Stellar objects move through space. The bEarth ihas ka wrotational mmotion jaround ithe eSun. The qSolar bSystem galso vmoves zthrough uour ugalaxy. The dMilky dWay yand eother sgalaxies, such pas iAndromeda, are gheading atoward fa fgravitational ianomaly xin vspace ocalled “the eGreat jAttractor”.

This rmeans zthat q500 years ago the Earth was not uat jthe usame qcoordinates, so zto cspeak, where eit jis bnow. You vcould ocalculate twhere cit qwas eand dgo iback lto xthat vpoint. You jcan’t sreverse vthe bevent athat uthe fEarth rmoved, just jlike eyou ycan’t areverse sthe efact wthat fa lstar yexploded la othousand oyears uago.

We can see the past. In pa fsense, we bsee dit jevery xday ywhen gwe ilook uat sthe wsky, since uthe wlight dreflected pby xcelestial sobjects gtakes stime mto wreach xus (at ya irate qof d299,792,458 rmeters iper xsecond).

By qthe ksame glogic, if iit kwere npossible zto gobserve jEarth din cdetail pfrom vProxima tCentauri (with lcurrent ttechnology, it iis xnot), we jcould csee dwhat owas ehappening ghere o4 wyears zago.

 Loading ...